admin 
The Investor 'view of the s policy is a simplistic, practical, "dot-connecting" approach aa select things in fashion from (win / win) power to consider the positive change. The policy of the real world is not interested in such things and that's one of most serious problems facing investors today. According to Policy 2008 "investment, there are at least ten issues that require government action if we do our competitive position in the global economy. Most of these are interrelated and should behave on the simultaneouslyâ € | thus causing a major political dilemma. Politicians are much more interested in talk of change which is really legislate in it; prefer just an issue specific support at a time so as not to appear too independent, and can 'conservation themselves tonnes from slipping back into the archaic distinction of now between investors and the poor people. Rich or poor, most Americans have investments. For the small investor become richer, its efforts must be encouraged by the € codeâ tax | the rich become richer despite the tax code! And, believe it or don 't, the vast majority of the rich (even business executives) is good, productive, worry-about – the environment, the people. At the root of the problem is the tremendous investment that the main parties have in the consolidation of disunity, jealousy and understand evil nell'elettorato. Republicans or Democrats in power (always) are ruining the country and, of course, the guys who are seeking power, will undoubtedly the same. Perhaps the most obvious example of political disoriented manual work is the negative attitude of most individuals to society, the large business and international economic cooperation. How entity without the right to vote but taxable, companies are easy to blame for everything that is wrong in society, easy to cite frivolous without remorse or control and popular to the taxâ € | by both parties! The sad thing is that most people don 't takes time to appreciate just how the success and profits are important business to their own financial interests, short and long term. The mutual investment funds, for example, perform better when businesses, large and small, thrive. The trade advantageous produce more jobs, provide higher salaries and (once all the additional fees, mandates, taxes and dispense eliminates) the lowest prices. Politicians have not been shy about nessuni dictation of "proper" behavior to individuals nor hesitant in shamelessly selection of the pockets of businesses to set up a fund for their projects. Entrepreneurs unpaid, for example, pay a 35% minimum income tax federal, condition and local taxes of various kinds and the usual compensation of the workers, the state Health Care and double social security taxes. Adds to improve that 50% quickly and, at every level, all taxes, subsidies, assessments, withholdings, compliance costs, etc.. are: 1) added to the price of goods and services, 2) considered in hiring decisions at all levels in all business entities and 3) split in decisions regarding the relocation of new locations of the establishment and function service. The trade will produce only work in an environment that recognizes the importance of the contributions that damage. The expressive tax reform must begin where the work begins. The reforms to the code specific tax system and pension / social security can then be integrated into | Just while the Congress selects the corporate pockets, the selection of € frameworkâ business of companies those of their shareholders. The compensation of corporate officers is an example of how free this went completely control, although it is understandable under the current € codesâ tax | corporate that is specific. Million dollar salaries, allowances, have postponed the compensation packages and all options are intended to avoid and / or defer taxes while, at the same time, are deductible on a dollar for dollar basis from business taxes. The changes from the staff could clean this up quickly but, for now, politicians have to focus more on proteggenti shareholders from these creative and excessive, compensation schemes. Eliminating the corporate income tax and all mechanisms of a deferred tax / / allowances that are not available to all employees at all levels, would be an excellent start. Then covers compensation packages to a total of € numberâ of specific | that any excess is paid only in the form of dividends to all shareholders. The corporate income tax is a non-productive weight on business decision makers, causing dispendii that would not be considered were not tax deductable. Ironically, salaries are not increased to reduce the tax bite because every dollar of salary brings with it an additional approximately 40% in overheads! All the real costs of doing business (and all perceived risks associated with doing trade) wrap up in the price of goods and services. The fact that governments can raise corporate costs so much more easily can raise individual 's taxes is perhaps the biggest game coverage today that threatens our economic well-being. If preferably, the congress cultivate the benefit of society, while regulators focus efforts on economic abuses of shareholders, employees and consumers, a whole new era of economic expansion and development performance of ensueâ € | and we 're just get began. Investors must impress on the candidates which include a change of expression during the tax code and that a second term just won 't happen without it. After the tax on business environment changes, politicians will be able to devote their energies to defining the "behavior" corporate and non-adjusted corporate affairs; control and compliance with a whole new set of rules and regulations. Converting the United States free trade area by eliminating all nuisance assessments from all levels of government: increase employment, reduce prices and multiply distributable dividends. Facendola happen should not be that difficult, especially with the growing outrage concerning the obscene compensation of business executives at a high level and consider how successful the FTZs was on the local level. Those responsible will operate these changes because the grounds are where the belongâ € | on the bottom line instead of the tax return. Small businesses would benefit from the reduction of fees and taxes and less would be forced in their efforts to develop. If you don 't made the right thing, will become less competitive in the market, and that's the way capitalism is supposed to work. But don 't is naive. The publicly held companies will need the sense of advice and surveillance
Steve Selengut
